Restitution and Criminal Punishment in Population: How Do They Work?
CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY EXPLAINS RESTITUTION FOR CRIMINAL LAW CASES
Many crimes carry financial losses. Victims are often the ones forced to endure these financial losses, including the loss of personal property, medical costs after an assault, or lost income. Under the Mandatory Restitution Act of 1996, the courts can determine whether restitution is warranted, and the amount of restitution the criminal defendant must pay to the victim or the victim’s family in criminal law in Population.
WHAT DOES RESTITUTION CONSIST OF?
Restitution in the criminal justice system refers to the funds that the defendant must pay to the victim for any financial harm caused by their actions. The court has the discretion and authority to force a defendant to pay restitution as part of his or her criminal punishment under criminal law. Some crimes carry a mandatory restitution, but this depends on the state. The high courts have backed the decision to order defendants to pay restitution. In fact, a case in 2010, where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the state correctly ordered restitution, proves such in criminal law.
Usually, violent felony offenses include restitution, but other cases can involve restitution if there are severe financial losses. Restitution might cover the out-of-pocket costs for the victim under criminal law, including:
Insurance deductibles and copays
Costs related to the criminal law case (e.g., travel, child care, etc.)
Lost or damaged property
Restitution is different from personal injury compensation. A victim will not receive pain and suffering or any form of compensation for his or her emotional distress. Instead, these damages only apply to what the victim physically paid for; usually, a receipt or bill is necessary to show the courts that the amounts are justified under criminal law in Population.
WILL RESTITUTION BE ORDERED IN MY CRIMINAL LAW CASE?
It is hard to predict what the courts will do, but restitution is more likely in two situations:
The victim has substantial proof of financial losses. If the victim has evidence of financial losses, and he or she can justify every loss claimed, the courts might order restitution to recover those costs.
A violent crime has occurred, and the request for restitution ordered. Sometimes, the courts wait for the prosecution to issue a request for restitution. Other times, the courts offer mandatory restitution in extremely violent cases. For example, the brutal beating of a victim could result in restitution automatically – regardless of whether the prosecution submits a request under criminal law.
FULL VERSUS PARTIAL RESTITUTION
When restitution is ordered, the courts look at the defendant’s ability to pay. Obviously, if the accused has no way to pay the losses, it is hard to force them to do so. So, the court might reduce the amount until the offender can pay in full. Sometimes, the courts will still issue restitution in full but set monthly payments so the offender can pay off the balance in a specific amount of time under criminal law.
You should note that, if you are on probation or parole and have a restitution payment schedule, missing a payment could result in a revocation of your probation or parole. Typically, timely payments are part of your release conditions in criminal law.
CONSULT WITH A CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY ABOUT POSSIBLE RESTITUTION
Restitution is ordered upon conviction, and is part of your criminal punishment. Therefore, you may have jail time and other penalties in addition to restitution. To avoid these harsh penalties, speak with a criminal defense attorney.
Accomplices, Accessories, Aiders, and Abettors 101
ACCUSED OF ASSISTING WITH A CRIME? YOU NEED AN EXPERIENCED CRIMINAL DEFENSE TEAM ON YOUR SIDE
Every state and federal statute has one hidden feature: Casual accomplices and the primary defendants both can face similar punishment.
The state classifies criminals in many forms, including the principal offender, accomplice, accessory, aider, abettor, and the conspirator. These classifications depend on the person’s role in the crime. The primary offender is the person who commits the crime or intends to commit the crime in criminal law. However, the definitions become muddled when it moves down the line and examines accomplices, aiders, and the like in criminal law.
WHAT IS AN ACCOMPLICE?
Assisting persons who directly assist the principal offender are accomplices. An accomplice intentionally helps the principal offender to commit the crime, and knows what they are doing is wrong. Even if the accomplice does not carry out the criminal act, the law considers all pre-crime assistance enough for accomplice status in criminal law.
The prosecution must prove that the accomplice intentionally aided the primary offender in the commission of the crime before, during, or after the actual criminal act. Realizing that the principal intends to commit a crime and not stopping them could constitute accomplice-like acts, as well in criminal law.
THE MORE COMPLICATED ASSISTANT DEFINITIONS
Once you pass as an accomplice, the definitions and classifications become more involved. All it takes is a single act or non-action to differentiate a person from one classification into the other. Some standard assistant definitions in criminal law include:
Aider and Abettor – The aider and abettor is the principal in the second degree. They were present at the crime scene but carried out a passive role. Their role, however, ensured the crime was carried out. For example, a person watching out for witnesses during a bank robbery would be an aider and abettor in criminal law.
Accessory Before the Fact – An accessory before the fact is a category of an accomplice who helps before the crime. They were not present at the crime scene but helped the principal prepare for the criminal act.
Accessory After the Fact – Accessory after the fact is the person who knows the principal committed a felony and helped them avoid arrest or trial. They did not know about the crime or help prepare but instead help avoid prosecution. An accessory after the fact is not as harshly punished as an accessory before the fact or an aider and abettor in criminal law.
Conspirator – Conspirators can consist of one or more people who agree to commit a criminal act together. Conspirators are all principals; therefore, they do not assist. Instead, they decide to commit a crime together. This is a highly controversial charge, however, because a conspirator does not have to commit the crime or follow through with the act in criminal law.
AVOID THE HARSH PUNISHMENTS OF HELPING WITH A CRIME
The crime of aiding and abetting means you have contributed to carry out a criminal offense in criminal law.
The punishment for this offense is severe; therefore, it is best if you speak with a criminal defense attorney. Aiding or abetting a criminal act could result in a range of punishments, including a misdemeanor offense, jail time, and possibly a prison sentence if you help with a felony act in criminal law.
When Does Possession Become an Intent to Sell?
CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS FIGHTING INTENT TO SELL CHARGES IN COURTS
Sometimes, possession is just possession. There are other instances where the prosecution might turn possession charges into an intent to sell or distribute charge. In this scenario, you are facing more than a misdemeanor. In fact, you are now facing punishments like drug trafficking. You could face a felony, massive financial penalties, and long-term repercussions – all for carrying too much of a controlled substance in criminal law.
Many people hold misconceptions about what constitutes intent to sell versus possession. If you are arrested for possession of any kind, it is in your best interest to hire a criminal defense attorney to ensure that an intent to distribute is not attached to your crime in criminal law.
THE TYPE OF DRUG AND THE CDS
The Controlled Dangerous Substances (CDS) is a federal list of drugs and associated penalties. The USA has five schedules to their CDS. Where you land on the schedules can also determine the minimum amount you are carrying to receive an intent to sell charge, in addition to possession. Schedule I are the most dangerous drugs because they have the highest rates of abuse and addiction. Regardless of which schedule you possess, it is illegal to make, sell, or possess any CDS-category substance in criminal law.
THE AMOUNT OF CDS DRUGS YOU ARE CAUGHT WITH MATTERS, TOO
When you are arrested, officers take all CDS substances as evidence. When you are caught with a large volume of a CDS, you might face drug trafficking or intent to distribute charges. However, the term “large size” is not always clear. When it comes to marijuana, carrying one ounce or less is considered personal use. Officers do not expect that someone with one or fewer ounces is distributing. However, if you were caught with eight ounces or more, you most likely will face a felony and drug trafficking charges in criminal law.
You are guilty of trafficking if you manufactured a controlled substances from Schedules I through V, or if you distributed, sold, or bartered these substances. Possession with intent to distribute applies to anyone with a controlled substance, including salts, isomers, and salts of isomers in criminal law.
THE PENALTIES FOR TRAFFICKING/INTENT TO DELIVER
If you are convicted of possession with intent to distribute, your charges could span dramatically depending on the amount and the type of substance you are caught with. Possession of marijuana is a felony that can involve up to 18 years in prison and a fine of up to $15,0000 in criminal law.
YOU HAVE CRIMINAL DEFENSE OPTIONS
Whether you intended to distribute or use your substances for personal use, you have defense options. A criminal defense attorney can argue that the substance was authorized (such as a prescription), disprove the prosecution’s case about distribution intent, and more in criminal law
Can I Receive Immunity for an Exchange in Testimony?
CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS DISCUSS OFFERING TESTIMONY IN EXCHANGE FOR IMMUNITY IN CRIMINAL CASES
It is your Constitutional right to remain silent when police or prosecutors ask information that forces you to self-incriminate yourself in criminal law.
However, you might be asked to provide information that is incriminating in return for immunity. Offering protection is a prosecutor’s way to override your privilege and access information you know, but also protects you against self-incrimination.
Note that in this post, you are only learning about the types of immunity you can receive. By no means does it constitute legal advice, and we do not necessarily suggest taking immunity in exchange for your testimony. Instead, you must always consult with a criminal defense attorney to see if immunity is best for your case and the consequences of testifying in criminal law.
TRANSACTIONAL IMMUNITY: COMPLETE PROTECTION
Out of the two types of immunity from prosecution offered, transactional is the broadest and most complete. Anything mentioned in your testimony becomes protected. That is why transactional immunity is often referred to as “blanket” immunity in criminal law.
Here are a few things to know about transactional immunity:
You cannot be prosecuted for admittance to criminal activity. If during your testimony you must admit to crimes, the prosecution cannot charge you with a crime or any crimes related to the information you say in that statement in criminal law.
Prosecutors can seek evidence elsewhere. While you have broad immunity, do not think that you would not be prosecuted. Prosecutors can learn elsewhere about your actions in a crime, gather evidence, and charge you with that crime later, especially if the crime is unrelated to the events you testify to in criminal law.
Prosecutors rarely offer such generous immunity. Rarely will you see a prosecutor offer this generous form of immunity. They do not want to allow a person to get away with a crime or escape punishment. Therefore, they might provide another type of immunity or no immunity in criminal law.
DERIVATIVE USE IMMUNITY
Also referred to as “use and derivative use” immunity, this is a common form of immunity issued by state prosecutors. If they decide that your testimony is worthwhile, they could extend derivative use immunity, but the scope of this protection is much narrower in criminal law.
The prosecution cannot use your statements or evidence that derives from your statements against you in a prosecution. However, there is more to this form of immunity than meets the eye:
Prosecutors can obtain independent evidence. During your testimony, if you indicate or hint that you played a role in the crime, prosecutors have the right to seek independent evidence. That independence evidence is not produced from your testimony, which gives them the right to prosecute you in criminal law.
Prosecutors might find another witness against you. Immunity for testimony becomes a vicious cycle at times. You not only receive protection, but the prosecution can also find a witness who will testify against you in exchange for immunity in criminal law.
Stipulations always apply. Typically, stipulations apply to all types of immunity. Therefore, it is important to review these stipulations, have them in writing, and have a criminal defense attorney by your side to ensure these stipulations do not increase the likelihood you will be charged with a crime too.
DO NOT ACCEPT IMMUNITY UNTIL YOU SPEAK WITH AN ATTORNEY
When prosecutors wave immunity in front of you, you might be tempted to take it. They might even tell you that the offer goes away if you speak to an attorney in criminal law.
Never accept an offer of immunity in exchange for your testimony without consulting an attorney. A criminal defense lawyer is better equipped for negotiating such deals and ensuring that you cannot be charged or arrested in the future based on what you testify to in criminal law.